HDA dataset issues: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Ped 17 on Cam 57 in frames 425 and 426 is unoccluded (but marked occluded in the annotations, and in the allD files..., and has the masks...) | Ped 17 on Cam 57 in frames 425 and 426 is unoccluded (but marked occluded in the annotations, and in the allD files..., and has the masks...) | ||
Ped 17 on Cam 60 in frame 598 is occluded but marked unoccluded | Ped 17 on Cam 60 in frame 598 is occluded but marked unoccluded | ||
Revision as of 13:55, 18 November 2014
hda_sample_train_data could be increased
Person 72 appears fully visible in camera 56 in frame 259 and is not in the hda_sample_train_data
Person 78 appears fully visible in camera 56 in frame 12 and is not in the hda_sample_train_data
It seems that since those two people are people that at the time needed to have their face blurred out, at the time they were not added to the training set.
It's probably not a good idea to change (add) stuff to hda_sample_train_data now, since there is already published results with this 250 image training set
---
Ped 17 on Cam 57 in frames 425 and 426 is unoccluded (but marked occluded in the annotations, and in the allD files..., and has the masks...)
Ped 17 on Cam 60 in frame 598 is occluded but marked unoccluded